Blog Of America - Global Warming

Newt and Geeks

Chip Meyer — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:31:30 GMT

I’ve been busy, so not a lot of posting lately. Ok, no posts. Part of this was the Primaries have caught my attention, and I don’t like any of the candidates. Mostly though, I really have been busy. It turns out I have a company to run. Who knew? However, with Newt’s recent upset in South Carolina, I began to see some hope in the race. Ever since Fred Thompson, I have been waiting for a candidate willing to fight for conservative principles. I was not happy about McCain, but when he selected Sarah Palin, I was ecstatic, hoping finally for a campaign of ideas. A fight. Unfortunately, McCain shut the Palin camp up, and eventually lost while trying to be the nice guy. It is not that conservatives think Newt is our spokesman. He blew that over the past several years with his lack of knowledge on Global Warming, one of the touchstones we use to determine who is really a conservative. I could list other examples, but the point is that Newt has not be ...

We’re not in Kansas anymore

Chip Meyer — Thu, 15 Dec 2011 03:40:21 GMT

Frankly, the portion of the scientific community that pushes political views as “science” is as dangerous as a dirty politician. For much the same reason. In fact, both groups appear to be motivated more by personal greed than they do political views. Both groups belong in jail (after a thorough public shaming). It is time to look behind that curtain. Here’s a nice summary of the corruption from the National Association of Scholars. H/t Instapundit

Conservatives and Science

Chip Meyer — Wed, 05 Oct 2011 03:48:13 GMT

Part of the responsibility of calling yourself a conservative is to do the research and get the facts right. Rep. Bob Inglis (R-SC) cannot make that claim, and as such has no right to call himself a conservative, let alone speak on behalf of the movement. If he had done the research, he would have found that global warming science a lot less settled than he is claiming. Declaring consensus is not a way to conduct science, nor does the declaration mean the science is settled. Especially when consensus was reached out of non-scientific motivations such as funding and other political gains. For that matter, what is “settled science”? Frankly, we thought Einstein settled a lot of science last century, with greater than 95% acceptance among physicists regarding the Theory of Relativity, and yet I note that there is a group out of CERN asking the community to scrutinize their work over recent findings that there might be faster-than-light neutrinos. Note that they are asking the scien ...

Climategate: Follow the Money

Chip Meyer — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:09:05 GMT

It’s always a good idea to follow the money. Basically, thanks to government funding, we created a bunch of climate whores.

Darwin Zero, Smoking Gun Won

Chip Meyer — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:28:00 GMT

First off, I am not even going to try and explain the headline. Read the Darwin Zero report from Willis Eschenbach at the informativeWatts Up With That site by Anthony Watts. You’ll either get it or you won’t. That’s part of the problem with liberals, they are too lazy to do the research, they trust their opinions and the opinions of friends, and ignore anything that contradicts them. Want to be right? Read the link. It won’t take all that long, and this is important. The following graph is the smoking gun, showing just how artificially the Climategate crowd has been altering the raw data to make it fit. The black line jumping every 20 years was averaged into raw data to turn a temperature decline into an increase. Even before Climategate, there was more than enough information available for a curious person to satisfy their self that global warming, if any, was not man made and certainly not caused by CO2. In other words, Climategate is only s ...

“Hide the decline” and Climategate explained

Chip Meyer — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:12:24 GMT

From the American Thinker come an in-depth exploration of the Climategate fraud, the lies used to push the idea of man-made global, as well as the tools and techniques used by the CRU and Michael Mann to “hide the decline”. On a related note, once again Americans need to turn to the British media to find information that the MSM has deemed unsuitable for the unwashed masses, as Climategate reveals “the most influential tree in the world.”

UN-American IPCC

Chip Meyer — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:46:25 GMT

To really understand the global warming scam, you have to understand the religious zealotry driving its proponents. To them, the problem isn’t that the world might get warmer, or colder. Instead, the issue is simply the U.S. Us. Americans. Western Civilization. The problem is we consume too much. In fact, if you don’t stop using your refrigerator and your air conditioning, we’re all going to die. That is not my hyperbole, that is from the chair of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), who claims that the western lifestyle is “unsustainable.” If we continue to live as we do, civilization will collapse. Calling our lifestyle unsustainable is a religious belief, not a scientific one. With that kind of righteousness driving the debate on global warming, it is no wonder that so many scientists felt obligated to fake their data.

Global Warming is a fraud

Chip Meyer — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:07:12 GMT

Global Warming is the largest fraud in history, and you should not tolerate proponents, even your friends.